![]() ![]() But here is a quick comparison of using AutoMocker with Moq vs. ![]() If you havenât used AutoMocker, you can quickly learn how it works by checking out the AutoMocker module in my Pluralsight Rhino Mocks video. It also cleans up your tests a bit when you have a number of dependencies. This reduces refactoring tension when new dependencies are added to your classes. NET for writing mock objects.Mock objects are objects which replace actual objects. AutoMocker allows you to abstract away the construction of the class under test so that your tests arenât coupled to the constructors of the class under test. The support for Rhino by StructureMap AutoMocker is cleaner due to the fact that the mocks returned by Rhino are actual implementations of the interface being mocked rather than a wrapper around the implementation which is what Moq provides. It took me a while to make sense of this message. There is also another benefit of using Rhino Mocks. Method â IRepository.Get (anything) â requires a return value or an exception to throw.If you dont give it an implementation as a substitute to the actual implementation, RhinoMocks will still call the actual method. Since each test in one fixture might use a different kind of test double, using Rhino Mocks eliminates the extra overhead of the test double implementations. MockRepository.GenerateMock, new Mock<. Use whatever one is most clear to the reader of the test, but Rhino Mocks can be helpful in reducing the number of test double classes that can pile up.Var classUnderTest = new ClassUnderTest(mockUserRepository) In RhinoMocks, when you use a partial mock, you can stub virtual methods and call AssertWasCalled later. A quick reference guide for Rhino Mocks (AAA syntax) users making the switch to Moq. Call( mockUserRepository.GetUserByName("user-name) ) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |